Introduction: The Trinity of Compliance and the Master’s Central Role

The command of a modern commercial vessel places the Master at the confluence of three powerful and distinct, yet deeply interconnected, institutional frameworks: the Flag State, the Classification Society, and the Protection & Indemnity (P&I) Club. These three entities form a “Trinity of Compliance,” a complex web of legal, technical, and financial regulations that govern every aspect of a ship’s life, from its construction and certification to its daily operations and response to emergencies. The Master, as the ultimate authority on board, is the operational nexus of this trinity, charged with the immense responsibility of navigating its demands, managing its requirements, and mitigating its inherent risks. This guide is designed to serve as an exhaustive, expert-level manual, equipping the Master with the detailed knowledge required to understand and manage the regulations, responsibilities, and recourse associated with each of these critical bodies.

The core purpose of this report is to move beyond a siloed understanding of these institutions and present them as they exist in reality: a single, integrated ecosystem of risk and compliance. A deficiency noted by a Classification Society surveyor is not merely a technical issue; it is a potential “clear ground” for a detailed Port State Control inspection, a breach of the P&I Club’s warranty of class, and a mark against the vessel’s operational record. A failure to adhere to Flag State regulations can invalidate statutory certificates, which in turn invalidates Class and insurance cover. The Master’s daily decisions—from supervising maintenance and conducting drills to documenting cargo operations and responding to an incident—have cascading effects across this entire framework. A lapse in one domain inevitably elevates risk in the other two.

Therefore, this guide is structured to reflect this integrated reality. It will scrutinize the distinct mandate of each entity—the Flag State as the source of legal authority, the Classification Society as the guardian of technical integrity, and the P&I Club as the partner in liability and loss prevention. It will then synthesize this knowledge into a practical, holistic framework for the Master, providing detailed checklists, procedural guides, and analyses of real-world case studies. By understanding the intricate interplay between Flag, Class, and P&I, the Master can transition from a reactive posture of simple compliance to a proactive stance of comprehensive risk management, safeguarding the vessel, the crew, the cargo, and the marine environment.

Part I: The Flag State – Your Vessel’s Nationality and Ultimate Authority

Section 1.1: Understanding the Flag State’s Mandate

The concept of the Flag State is the bedrock of international maritime law. It is the jurisdiction in which a commercial or merchant vessel is registered, a process that confers upon the ship a nationality and the exclusive right to fly that nation’s flag.¹ This registration is not merely symbolic; it establishes the primary source of legal authority over the vessel, particularly on the high seas where the laws of a single coastal state do not apply. The Flag State has the authority and the profound responsibility to enforce regulations over vessels registered under its flag, governing everything from inspection and certification to safety and pollution prevention.²

The foundational duties of a Flag State are enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which serves as the “constitution for the oceans.” UNCLOS mandates that every state shall fix the conditions for the grant of its nationality to ships, for their registration, and for the right to fly its flag.⁴ Crucially, it imposes a primary responsibility on the Flag State to exercise effective jurisdiction and control in administrative, technical, and social matters over ships flying its flag.⁴ This includes taking all necessary measures to ensure safety at sea concerning the construction, equipment, and seaworthiness of ships, as well as the manning of ships, labor conditions, and the training of crews.⁷

A primary function of the Flag State is to implement and enforce the vast body of international maritime law developed by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The IMO, a specialized agency of the United Nations, develops global standards for safety, security, and environmental performance in international shipping, but it does not police them.⁶ That responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of its member governments in their capacity as Flag States.⁶ When a government accepts an IMO Convention—such as the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), or the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC, 2006)—it agrees to make that convention part of its national law and to enforce it rigorously on all ships flying its flag.⁹

To fulfill these obligations, a Flag State must establish a robust maritime administration with the necessary legal and technical infrastructure.³ This includes the capacity to promulgate national laws, conduct surveys and inspections, issue statutory certificates, investigate casualties, and impose penalties for violations.³ However, the global nature of shipping presents a practical challenge: a Flag State cannot maintain a physical inspection presence in every port worldwide. In recognition of this, international law permits Flag States to delegate many of their survey and certification functions to “Recognized Organizations” (ROs).⁸ These ROs are almost always Classification Societies, which possess the global network of technical experts needed to perform these duties on the Flag State’s behalf.¹¹ This delegation is a formal process, governed by the IMO’s RO Code, which sets standards for the organizations and for the Flag State’s oversight of them.¹⁶ For the Master, this means that the Classification Society surveyor who comes aboard to inspect the vessel is often wearing two hats: one as a representative of the private classification society, and one as an authorized agent of the Flag State government.

The following table provides a practical summary of the key IMO instruments that a Flag State must implement, translating these high-level conventions into the concrete documents and responsibilities the Master manages on a daily basis.

Table 1: Key IMO Instruments and Their Core Requirements for Masters

Convention / Code	Core Mandate	Key Onboard Document(s)	Master’s Key Responsibility
SOLAS Chapter IX (ISM Code)	International Safety Management	Document of Compliance (DOC) for the company; Safety Management Certificate (SMC) for the ship.18	Implement and maintain the vessel’s Safety Management System (SMS); ensure all crew are familiar with their duties under the SMS; conduct drills and training.20
SOLAS Chapter XI-2 (ISPS Code)	International Ship and Port Facility Security	International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC); Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR).18	Implement the Ship Security Plan (SSP); control access to the ship; conduct security drills and training; report security incidents.14
MARPOL Annex I	Prevention of Pollution by Oil	International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (IOPP); Oil Record Book (ORB); Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP).18	Ensure no illegal discharge of oil; maintain accurate ORB entries; ensure crew is trained to execute the SOPEP in an emergency.11
MARPOL Annex VI	Prevention of Air Pollution	International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (IAPP); Engine International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (EIAPP); Bunker Delivery Notes.18	Ensure use of compliant fuel, especially in Emission Control Areas (ECAs); properly manage and record fuel changeovers; oversee operation of exhaust gas cleaning systems if fitted.
STCW Convention	Standards of Training, Certification & Watchkeeping	Certificates of Competency (CoC) for all officers and ratings; Flag State endorsements.19	Ensure all crew members hold valid certificates for their rank and function; maintain proper watchkeeping arrangements; ensure records of rest hours are accurately maintained.
MLC, 2006	Maritime Labour Convention	Maritime Labour Certificate; Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance (DMLC Parts I & II); Seafarer Employment Agreements (SEAs).18	Ensure compliance with all standards regarding seafarers’ working and living conditions, including accommodation, food, medical care, and payment of wages.
Load Lines Convention (LL)	Ship Stability and Subdivision	International Load Line Certificate.18	Ensure the vessel is not loaded beyond its assigned load lines; maintain weathertight and watertight integrity.

Section 1.2: National Registries vs. Flags of Convenience (FOCs)

Not all Flag States are created equal. The global fleet is registered across two fundamentally different types of registries: traditional national registries and open registries, the latter being the source of what are commonly known as “Flags of Convenience” (FOCs).²⁴ A national, or “closed,” registry is typically open only to vessels owned by citizens or companies of that nation and may require a certain percentage of the crew to be nationals as well.²⁶ In contrast, an open registry allows foreign shipowners to register their vessels with minimal to no requirements regarding ownership or crew nationality.²⁶ Today, an estimated 73% of the world’s merchant fleet sails under a flag of convenience, with Panama, Liberia, and the Marshall Islands being the largest.¹

This distinction is critical because it goes to the heart of the “genuine link” principle in international law, which posits that there must be a real connection between the Flag State and the ships it registers.⁴ With national registries, this link is clear through ownership, crewing, and direct governmental oversight. In the FOC system, this link is often tenuous at best. Many FOC registries are not even government agencies but are private companies, often located outside the actual Flag State, that manage the registry for profit, sharing the revenue with the host country.⁵

The appeal of FOCs to shipowners is primarily economic and regulatory. They compete for business by offering incentives such as low registration fees, minimal or no taxation, and, most significantly, the avoidance of stricter national regulations concerning crew wages, working conditions, safety standards, and trade union oversight.¹ This practice, which began in the 1920s when U.S. passenger ships registered in Panama to serve alcohol during Prohibition, allows owners to reduce operating costs and enhance competitiveness.²⁵

However, this “convenience” comes at a significant cost to maritime safety and seafarer welfare. FOCs are frequently criticized for their poor safety records and for lacking the resources or the political will to effectively enforce the international conventions they have ratified.⁵ This creates a system where shipowners can “flag hop,” easily moving a substandard vessel from one registry to another to evade regulations or inspections.⁴ The International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) has long campaigned against the FOC system, citing issues like low wages, poor onboard conditions, overworked crews, and the use of FOCs to conceal illicit activities like illegal fishing or smuggling.²⁸ Certain FOCs have become notorious as “end-of-life” registries, offering cheap, fast-track “last voyage” packages for vessels destined for South Asian scrapyards, often with full knowledge of their substandard condition.⁵

This dynamic places the Master of an FOC-flagged vessel in a uniquely challenging and paradoxical position. They are legally bound to a Flag State that may be indifferent or incapable of providing meaningful support, yet they are held to the highest international standards by the Port States they visit. The very existence of Port State Control (PSC) is a direct response to the failure of some Flag States, particularly FOCs, to fulfill their enforcement duties under UNCLOS.² A Master on a Liberian-flagged vessel entering a port in the United States or Europe will not be granted any “convenience”; their vessel will be inspected against the same stringent IMO standards as a vessel from a national registry. In fact, the flag itself is a key risk factor in the PSC targeting matrix, meaning a vessel from a poorly performing FOC registry is more likely to be selected for inspection.³⁰ This effectively shifts the entire burden of compliance onto the ship’s operator and, ultimately, onto the Master. Without a supportive and competent Flag State administration to turn to for guidance or intervention, the Master is left to ensure the vessel is in pristine condition to withstand the intense scrutiny of PSC, knowing that their flag offers no protection and may even invite it.

Table 2: Comparison of National vs. Open Registries (FOCs)

Characteristic	National / Traditional Registry	Open Registry (Flag of Convenience)
“Genuine Link”	Strong link between ship, owner, and state.5	Weak or non-existent link; ownership is foreign.4
Ownership/Crewing	Typically requires national ownership and/or crew.26	No nationality requirements for owner or crew.5
Regulatory Oversight	Direct oversight by a government maritime administration.15	Often managed by private companies for profit; enforcement can be lax.5
Economic Model	Part of national infrastructure; fees and taxes support the state.	A source of revenue for the state, offering low taxes and fees to attract foreign owners.1
PSC Targeting Risk	Generally lower, depending on the specific flag’s performance record (e.g., Paris MoU Whitelist).	Generally higher; many FOCs are on PSC grey or blacklists, increasing inspection frequency.5
Support for Master	Master can typically contact a responsive government administration for guidance.	Support is often minimal or non-existent; Master relies entirely on the company.29
Labor Standards	Subject to national labor laws and union agreements.	Often allows circumvention of stricter labor laws, leading to lower wages and poorer conditions.28

Section 1.3: The Master’s Direct Responsibilities to the Flag State

Regardless of whether the flag is national or one of convenience, the Master has specific, non-delegable responsibilities to the Flag State. These duties are the practical embodiment of the Flag State’s jurisdiction over the vessel.

First and foremost is the responsibility for certification. The Master must ensure that all statutory certificates required by the Flag State, which are issued to demonstrate compliance with IMO conventions, are on board, currently valid, and readily available for inspection.¹ This is a foundational requirement for legal trade. These documents are the primary evidence that the vessel meets international standards. They include certificates for the ship itself, such as the Safety Construction Certificate, Load Line Certificate, and International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate, as well as certificates for the crew, such as Certificates of Competency (CoCs) and the necessary Flag State endorsements that recognize those qualifications.¹⁸ A missing or expired certificate is an immediate “clear ground” for a Port State Control officer to detain the vessel.³²

Second is the duty of reporting. The Master is legally obligated to report certain incidents to the Flag State administration in accordance with its national laws and relevant international codes, such as the Casualty Investigation Code.³ These reportable incidents typically include collisions, groundings, fires, heavy weather damage, pollution events, serious injury or loss of life, and any other occurrence that affects the vessel’s seaworthiness or structural integrity.³³ Timely and accurate reporting is essential for the Flag State to fulfill its own international obligation to investigate casualties involving its ships.³

Third is compliance with national law. While IMO conventions set the international minimum standard, a Flag State may have its own specific laws and regulations that supplement or even exceed these requirements.¹ The Master is responsible for knowing and adhering to these unique national rules, which could pertain to anything from specific equipment requirements to manning scales or environmental regulations in that nation’s territorial waters.

Finally, the Master is responsible for maintaining official records. Key shipboard documents such as the Official Logbook, Deck and Engine Logbooks, Oil Record Book, and Garbage Record Book are not merely internal records; they are legal documents subject to inspection by both Flag State and Port State authorities.³⁴ The Master must ensure these records are maintained accurately, honestly, and in the format prescribed by the regulations. Any discrepancies, especially in documents like the Oil Record Book, can lead to severe penalties, including fines and criminal charges.

Section 1.4: Navigating Port State Control (PSC): The Flag State’s Authority Tested

Port State Control (PSC) is the inspection of foreign ships in national ports to verify that the condition of the ship, its equipment, and its crew comply with the requirements of international conventions.³⁵ It was established as a “second line of defence” against substandard shipping, designed to act as a critical backstop to Flag State implementation.⁹ The authority for a state to inspect a foreign vessel in its port is granted by the very conventions the inspection is meant to enforce, such as SOLAS and MARPOL, as well as by UNCLOS.⁴ To improve efficiency and avoid multiple inspections of the same ship in a region, most of the world is covered by regional PSC agreements, known as Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs), such as the Paris MoU in Europe and the Tokyo MoU in Asia.⁹

The PSC inspection process is not random; it is a highly structured, risk-based system. Ships are targeted for inspection using a sophisticated calculation that creates a Ship Risk Profile (SRP).³⁰ This profile is based on both generic factors (ship age, type, etc.) and historical performance factors, including the safety record of the Flag State, the Classification Society, and the ship’s management company.³⁰ Ships are categorized as Low, Standard, or High Risk, which determines the inspection interval—a High Risk Ship (HRS) can be inspected as frequently as every 5-6 months, while a Low Risk Ship (LRS) may go 24-36 months between inspections.³⁸ Certain “overriding factors,” such as a reported incident or a ship being suspended from its class, will trigger a mandatory inspection regardless of its risk profile.³⁸

A PSC inspection typically proceeds in stages:

1. Initial Inspection: The Port State Control Officer (PSCO) boards the vessel and begins by examining the ship’s certificates and documents. This is a crucial first check of the vessel’s compliance on paper.³² The PSCO will verify the validity of all statutory and class certificates, crew documentation, and evidence of mandatory insurance, such as the P&I Certificate of Entry and the financial security certificates required by the MLC.⁴⁰ During this phase, the officer also forms a general impression of the vessel’s maintenance, cleanliness, and the crew’s professionalism.³⁰
2. More Detailed and Expanded Inspections: If the PSCO finds “clear grounds” during the initial check, the inspection will escalate. “Clear grounds” are any evidence that suggests the ship, its equipment, or its crew do not substantially comply with regulations.³² This could be a missing or expired certificate, visibly poor maintenance (e.g., heavy corrosion, leaking pipes), or a crew that appears unfamiliar with essential safety procedures.³² The inspection then becomes a “More Detailed Inspection,” focusing on the area of concern and potentially other areas at random.³² For certain high-risk vessel types over 12 years of age, an “Expanded Inspection” is mandatory, which is a highly comprehensive survey of the ship’s structure and systems.³²

If deficiencies are found, they are recorded in the inspection report using a specific code and assigned a required action, such as “rectify before departure” (Code 17), “rectify at next port,” or “rectify within 14 days”.³¹ If the PSCO judges that the deficiencies are so serious as to make the ship “unfit to proceed to sea” or pose an “unreasonable risk to the ship, its crew or the environment,” the vessel will be detained.⁴⁶

A detention is one of the most severe and costly events a ship can face. The direct financial consequences are immediate and substantial, including the loss of daily revenue (which can be tens of thousands of dollars), high daily port charges, the cost of repairs, and potential fines.⁴⁶ The indirect consequences are equally damaging, including schedule disruptions, breach of charter party agreements, and significant harm to the reputation of the shipowner and manager, which can affect future charters and insurance premiums.⁴⁷ The vessel cannot sail until the deficiencies are rectified to the satisfaction of the PSCO, who must be called back for a re-inspection, which also incurs a fee.⁴⁶

It becomes clear that a PSC inspection is far more than a simple check-up. It is a comprehensive, systemic audit of the vessel’s entire compliance framework. The PSCO, in a single visit, is effectively testing the performance of every key stakeholder. When they review the certificates, they are auditing the Flag State and its Recognized Organization (the Classification Society).⁴¹ When they inspect the physical condition of the hull and machinery, they are auditing the effectiveness of the Class survey regime and the owner’s commitment to maintenance.⁴¹ When they ask the crew to launch a lifeboat or start the emergency fire pump, they are auditing the effectiveness of the company’s Safety Management System (SMS) and the crew’s training under STCW.³² Therefore, a Master preparing for a PSC inspection cannot focus on one area in isolation. The only path to a clean inspection is a systemic one: a vessel that is impeccably maintained (satisfying Class), operated by a well-drilled and competent crew (satisfying the SMS and STCW), with flawless documentation (satisfying the Flag State). A failure in any one of these areas is a “clear ground” that invites deeper scrutiny and can trigger a cascade of problems.

Part II: The Classification Society – The Guardian of Technical Integrity

Section 2.1: The Dual Mandate of Class: Commercial vs. Statutory

Classification Societies are non-governmental organizations that establish and maintain technical standards for the design, construction, and operation of ships and offshore structures.⁵¹ Their role is fundamental to the maritime industry, and for the Master, it is essential to understand that they operate under a dual mandate, serving two distinct masters: the shipowner and the Flag State.

The original and primary role of a Classification Society is commercial, performed on behalf of the shipowner. In this capacity, the society verifies that a vessel complies with its own set of proprietary technical standards, known as “Class Rules”.¹³ These rules, developed through extensive research and experience, cover the structural integrity of the hull, the reliability of essential machinery, and the safety of electrical and control systems.¹³ The process begins with the approval of the ship’s design, continues with surveys during construction, and extends throughout the ship’s life with periodic surveys to ensure it is maintained to the required standard.¹³ Upon successful completion of these surveys, the society issues a “Classification Certificate” and enters the vessel into its Register of Ships.¹⁴ This certificate is not a guarantee of seaworthiness but a verification of compliance with the rules.⁵² It is, however, a critical document, as maintaining a vessel “in class” with a reputable society is a prerequisite for securing both Hull & Machinery and P&I insurance.⁵²

The second role of a Classification Society is statutory, performed on behalf of a Flag State administration as a Recognized Organization (RO).¹⁴ As discussed previously, most Flag States lack the global reach to conduct their own statutory surveys. They therefore delegate this authority to Class societies, empowering them to inspect ships and issue international statutory certificates required by IMO conventions like SOLAS, MARPOL, and the Load Lines Convention.¹¹ When a Class surveyor boards a vessel to conduct a survey for a Safety Construction Certificate, they are acting as an agent of the government whose flag the vessel flies.¹⁵ The scope of this delegation varies; some flags delegate nearly all tasks, while others, like Germany, delegate only specific duties.¹⁴ To ensure a high standard of work, major flag administrations and regional bodies like the European Union will only recognize certain “quality” classification societies, which are typically members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).¹⁴

For a Master, it is critically important to distinguish between a “Class” requirement and a “Statutory” requirement, even though they are often checked by the same surveyor during the same visit. A deficiency may affect one, the other, or, most commonly, both, and the consequences differ significantly. For example, a minor dent in a bulkhead in a non-critical area might be a deviation from Class rules but have no statutory implications. The surveyor might issue a “Memorandum to Owner” to record it, but it does not affect the vessel’s ability to trade.⁵⁹ Conversely, a non-functional emergency fire pump is a direct violation of SOLAS, a statutory convention. This deficiency makes the vessel’s Safety Equipment Certificate invalid and renders the ship detainable by Port State Control, even if the pump itself is technically “in class”.⁶⁰ More often, a single defect has dual implications. A heavily corroded ballast pipe violates Class rules regarding material condition, warranting a Condition of Class. At the same time, because that pipe is part of a system critical for maintaining the vessel’s stability as required by the Load Lines Convention (a statutory instrument), its failure is also a statutory deficiency. The Master must understand this distinction to correctly prioritize repairs, appreciate the full scope of the vessel’s legal jeopardy, and communicate effectively with the company, the surveyor, and any authorities involved.

Section 2.2: The Master’s Guide to the Survey Cycle

The process of maintaining a vessel’s classification is not a one-time event but a continuous cycle of surveys designed to ensure the ship remains in compliance with the rules throughout its operational life. This survey cycle generally follows a five-year pattern, harmonized with the five-year validity of most statutory certificates.⁵³ Understanding the rhythm and requirements of this cycle is a core responsibility for the Master and the ship’s senior officers, as it dictates maintenance planning, operational scheduling, and budget allocation.

The survey cycle includes the following key inspections:

• Initial Survey: This is a comprehensive survey conducted before a ship is first put into service or when it is transferred to a new Classification Society. It verifies that the vessel’s design, construction, and equipment fully comply with all applicable Class and statutory rules.⁶²
• Annual Survey (AS): As the name implies, this survey is conducted every year, typically within a six-month window around the anniversary date of the ship’s initial certification (three months before to three months after).⁶¹ It is a general inspection to confirm that the vessel is being maintained in a satisfactory condition. The surveyor will conduct a walk-around inspection of the hull, decks, and machinery spaces; check the operation of key safety systems; and verify that no unauthorized structural alterations have been made.⁶³
• Intermediate Survey (ITSS): This survey takes the place of the second or third annual survey within the five-year cycle.⁶¹ It is significantly more detailed than an annual survey. In addition to the annual survey items, the ITSS requires a more thorough examination of the ship’s structure, including the inspection of a representative number of salt-water ballast tanks and, for certain ship types like tankers and bulk carriers, cargo spaces.⁶¹
• Special Survey (SS) / Renewal Survey: This is the most comprehensive and rigorous survey in the cycle, conducted every five years to renew the vessel’s Classification Certificate.⁶¹ The Special Survey requires extensive close-up inspections of the ship’s hull structure, detailed testing of all machinery and systems, and, particularly for older vessels, widespread thickness measurements (gauging) of steel plates and structural members to assess corrosion and wastage.⁶⁶ This survey requires meticulous advance planning by the owner, often involving the submission of an Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) questionnaire and survey plan to the Class society for approval months in advance.⁶⁸
• Docking Survey (DS) / In-Water Survey (IWS): This survey focuses on the inspection of the underwater parts of the ship’s hull, including the shell plating, rudder, propeller, and sea chests. A minimum of two such inspections are required within every five-year period, with the interval between them not exceeding 36 months.⁶² Traditionally, this requires the vessel to be placed in a dry dock. However, for many modern vessels, one of the two docking surveys may be substituted with an In-Water Survey (IWS), where the inspection is carried out by approved divers or Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) while the vessel is afloat.⁶³

The following table provides a clear timeline of this cycle, helping the Master and senior officers to anticipate and prepare for these critical inspections.

Table 3: The 5-Year Classification Survey Cycle: Timing and Scope

Year in Cycle	Survey Name(s)	Typical Scope/Focus	Master’s Key Preparation Task
Year 1	Annual Survey (AS)	General inspection of hull, machinery, and equipment. Verification of certificates. Check of fire and safety systems.61	Ensure all certificates are in order and readily available. Ensure good general housekeeping and maintenance.
Year 2	Annual Survey (AS), Docking Survey (DS) / In-Water Survey (IWS)	All AS items. Inspection of underwater hull, propeller, rudder, and sea chests.61	Coordinate with company for dry-docking or IWS scheduling. Ensure hull is clean for inspection.
Year 3	Intermediate Survey (ITSS)	All AS items plus more in-depth examination. Inspection of representative ballast tanks and cargo spaces.61	Plan for tank cleaning and gas-freeing. Arrange for safe access (staging, rafts, or drones) for surveyors.
Year 4	Annual Survey (AS), Docking Survey (DS) / In-Water Survey (IWS)	All AS items. Second inspection of underwater hull within the 5-year period.61	Coordinate second dry-docking or IWS. Begin detailed planning and preparation for the upcoming Special Survey.
Year 5	Special Survey (SS) / Renewal Survey	Most comprehensive survey. All ITSS items plus extensive close-up surveys, thickness measurements, and testing of all systems.61	Work with company to complete and submit ESP documents. Coordinate with thickness measurement company. Ensure all spaces are prepared for inspection.

Section 2.3: Maintaining Class: A Continuous Responsibility

Maintaining a vessel’s classification is not a matter of simply passing periodic surveys; it is a continuous, ongoing responsibility that rests with the shipowner and is executed on a daily basis by the Master and crew.⁶⁹ The Classification Certificate is issued on the condition that the vessel is maintained in accordance with the rules at all times, not just on the day of the survey.

A critical aspect of this continuous responsibility is the obligation to report any damage or incident that may affect the vessel’s class. Should a vessel sustain damage from a collision, grounding, heavy weather, or machinery failure, the owner or Master must notify the Classification Society promptly so that a damage survey can be arranged.⁵³ The surveyor will assess the extent of the damage and determine if it has compromised the vessel’s structural integrity or the safety of its systems. Based on this assessment, the surveyor will specify the necessary repairs to bring the vessel back into compliance. Similarly, if a vessel is detained by a Port State authority, the owner is obligated to notify their Class society; failure to do so can be grounds for suspension or cancellation of class.³⁹

The consequences of failing to maintain class, or “falling out of class,” are severe and immediate. A vessel that is not “in class” is effectively uninsurable and unable to trade legally. The vessel’s P&I and Hull & Machinery insurance policies are predicated on the vessel being maintained in class with an approved society; a lapse in class voids this coverage.⁵² Furthermore, since many statutory certificates (like the Safety Construction and Load Line certificates) are issued by Class on behalf of the Flag State, losing class can lead to the invalidation of these certificates as well. A vessel without valid class and statutory certification will be immediately detained by Port State Control and will be unable to sail until its status is restored.⁷⁰

Section 2.4: Responding to a “Condition of Class” (CoC)

During a survey, a Class surveyor may identify a deficiency that is serious enough to affect the vessel’s classification but does not pose an immediate danger that would prevent the ship from sailing. In such cases, instead of detaining the vessel, the surveyor will impose a “Condition of Class” (CoC), sometimes referred to as a “Recommendation” by some societies.⁵⁹ A CoC is a formal mandate requiring that the specified defect be rectified and presented to a surveyor for inspection within a designated timeframe.⁵⁹ This distinguishes it from a “Memorandum to Owner” (MO), which is an informational note about a minor deviation or condition that does not affect class.⁵⁹

The issuance of a CoC is a serious matter that requires a prompt and systematic response from the Master. The following actions are critical:

1. Acknowledge and Understand: The Master must engage directly with the surveyor to ensure a complete understanding of the deficiency. This includes clarifying the exact nature of the problem, the specific corrective action required by the society, and the firm deadline for its completion.⁷⁴
2. Report Immediately: The Master must report the CoC to the company’s designated person ashore (DPA) or the vessel superintendent without any delay. This communication is vital for coordinating the necessary resources for repair.
3. Implement Temporary Measures: The surveyor may impose temporary operational requirements as part of the CoC to ensure safety until permanent repairs are made. This could include restrictions on cargo loading, speed limitations, or specific weather avoidance measures.⁵⁹ A real-world example involved a vessel that lost its port anchor and was issued a CoC by its class society requiring it to keep its main engine on standby at all times while at anchor until a replacement was fitted.⁷⁵ The Master is responsible for strictly enforcing these temporary measures.
4. Plan for Rectification: The Master must work closely with the company to develop a plan for the permanent repair. This involves ordering the necessary spares and materials, scheduling labor, and coordinating with the Classification Society to arrange for a follow-up survey to verify the repair and formally clear the CoC from the vessel’s record.

Failure to address a CoC within the stipulated deadline has the same grave consequences as falling out of class. The vessel’s classification status will be suspended or withdrawn, leading to the invalidation of insurance and statutory certificates and making the vessel subject to detention.⁷³ A Condition of Class is not an optional suggestion; it is a formal requirement for the continued classification of the vessel.

Part III: The P&I Club – Your Partner in Liability and Loss Prevention

Section 3.1: Demystifying P&I: Mutual, Third-Party Liability Cover

Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance is a specialized form of marine insurance that covers shipowners for a vast range of liabilities owed to third parties—risks that are not covered by standard Hull & Machinery (H&M) policies, which protect against physical damage to the vessel itself.⁷⁶ P&I Clubs, the entities that provide this cover, are fundamentally different from traditional insurance companies. They are non-profit, mutual insurance associations, meaning they are owned and controlled by their shipowner and charterer members.⁷⁷

This mutual model operates on a system of risk pooling. Members pay contributions, known as “calls” (equivalent to premiums), into a common fund.⁷⁷ When a member incurs a covered liability, the claim is paid out of this pool. If claims in a given year are low, members may receive a refund or pay a lower call the following year. Conversely, if claims are unexpectedly high, the club may need to make a supplementary call on its members to replenish the fund.⁷⁷

The scale of potential maritime liabilities—such as a major oil spill or a collision resulting in multiple fatalities—can be astronomical, far exceeding the resources of a single club. To manage this catastrophic risk, the world’s 12 leading P&I Clubs have formed the International Group of P&I Clubs (IG).⁷⁸ The IG clubs, which collectively insure approximately 90% of the world’s ocean-going tonnage, operate a sophisticated claims-sharing and reinsurance program.⁴⁰ Under this arrangement, claims are pooled among all IG clubs above an individual club’s retention (currently USD 10 million), and this massive pool is then protected by one of the largest commercial reinsurance programs in the world, providing cover for claims that can run into billions of dollars.⁷⁸

The scope of P&I cover is exceptionally broad, designed to protect the shipowner against a wide array of third-party claims. The key areas of liability covered include ⁴⁰:

• Liabilities to Persons: Loss of life, personal injury, or illness of crew members, passengers, stevedores, pilots, or any other person on board or in connection with the ship’s operation.
• Cargo Liabilities: Loss of or damage to cargo being carried on board the vessel.
• Pollution Liabilities: Costs of cleanup, fines, and third-party damages arising from the escape of oil or other hazardous substances from the ship.
• Collision and Property Damage: Liability for damage to the other vessel in a collision (typically the portion not covered by H&M insurance), and liability for damage to fixed and floating objects (FFO) such as docks, buoys, and bridges.
• Wreck Removal: Costs associated with the compulsory removal of the wreck of the entered ship.
• Fines and Penalties: Fines levied by authorities for regulatory violations, such as accidental pollution, customs or immigration breaches, or safety infractions.

Proof of this vital insurance is the Certificate of Entry, a document issued by the P&I Club to its member for each entered vessel. This certificate is a mandatory document that must be carried on board and presented to port authorities upon request to demonstrate that the vessel has the necessary financial security to cover its potential liabilities.⁴⁰

Section 3.2: The Master as the First Line of Defense: Proactive Loss Prevention

While the primary function of a P&I Club is to pay claims, a core part of its mission is to prevent those claims from occurring in the first place. Because the clubs are owned by their members, every dollar paid out in claims is ultimately a dollar paid by the membership. Consequently, P&I Clubs are heavily invested in loss prevention and risk management.⁴⁰ They employ teams of highly experienced mariners, naval architects, and engineers whose sole focus is to analyze claims data, identify risk trends, and provide practical advice to members to help them operate more safely and efficiently.⁸¹

This creates an invaluable resource for the Master. A Master who only interacts with their P&I Club in the frantic moments after an incident is profoundly underutilizing one of their most powerful allies. The modern, effective Master must act as a proactive risk manager, leveraging the vast repository of knowledge and expertise their Club provides to strengthen shipboard procedures and train their crew before a loss occurs.

P&I Clubs produce a wealth of high-quality, practical loss prevention material, specifically designed for use by shipboard personnel. The Master should make it a standard practice to integrate these resources into the vessel’s safety and training programs. These resources typically include:

• Master’s Guides and Technical Publications: These are detailed, practical handbooks covering key areas of shipboard operations that are frequent sources of P&I claims. Examples include guides on berthing operations, container securing, the carriage of specific cargoes like steel or grain, hatch cover maintenance, and bunkering procedures.⁸³ Other publications provide guidance on complex issues like bills of lading, environmental protection, and dealing with stowaways.⁸⁵
• Case Studies, Bulletins, and Alerts: Clubs regularly publish analyses of real-world incidents, stripping away identifying details to present the chain of events, the root causes, and the critical lessons learned.⁸⁷ These cover a wide range of accidents, from engine room fires and cargo liquefaction to navigational errors and anchor loss.⁷⁵ These case studies are powerful training tools, allowing crews to learn from the mistakes of others.
• Risk Management Briefings and Articles: Clubs also publish in-depth articles and briefings on broader topics such as developing a robust safety culture, managing crew wellbeing and mental health, navigating complex sanctions regimes, and understanding new regulations.⁹³

A proactive Master can transform the P&I relationship from a reactive, post-incident emergency service into a continuous cycle of learning and improvement. For instance, before undertaking a critical anchoring operation in a congested area with strong tides, the Master could hold a briefing with the bridge team and review the Club’s case study on anchor dragging incidents.⁷⁵ Before loading a steel cargo, the Chief Officer could use the Club’s “Master’s Guide to the Carriage of Steel Cargo” to refresh their knowledge on stowage principles and dunnage requirements.⁸⁴ This approach directly addresses known risks using data-driven insights from the insurer, significantly reducing the likelihood of the very claims the Club exists to cover.

Section 3.3: The “Golden Hour”: The Master’s Critical Role in Incident Response

Despite the best efforts at loss prevention, incidents will happen. When they do, the Master’s actions in the immediate aftermath—the “golden hour”—are absolutely critical. The initial response can have a profound impact on the ultimate outcome, influencing the safety of life, the extent of environmental damage, and the owner’s legal and financial liability, which can run into millions of dollars. The Master’s responsibilities in this high-stress period can be distilled into two cardinal rules: NOTIFY and PRESERVE.

Immediate Notification Protocol

Prompt and accurate notification is essential to activate the network of support available to the vessel. The Master must ensure the following parties are informed without delay:

1. Company: The first call should always be to the ship’s owner or manager, specifically the Designated Person Ashore (DPA) under the ISM Code. This ensures the company’s emergency response plan is activated.⁹⁷
2. P&I Correspondent: The Master must contact the P&I Club’s nearest local correspondent immediately. A list of correspondents worldwide is provided by the Club and must be readily accessible on the bridge.⁹⁷ The correspondent is the gateway to the Club’s resources, including surveyors, lawyers, and technical experts.
3. Authorities: The Master must report the incident to the relevant authorities as required by law. This may include the local Coast Guard, Port Authority, or Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC), depending on the location and nature of the incident.³³

Evidence Preservation Protocol

The outcome of any subsequent legal or insurance claim will hinge on the quality of the evidence available. Memories fade, and physical evidence can be lost or altered. It is the Master’s paramount duty to preserve a complete and accurate record of the incident.

DO:

• Collect Physical Evidence: Secure any broken or failed equipment (e.g., a parted mooring rope, a failed hose). Label it clearly with the date, time, and location, and store it in a secure place.⁹⁷
• Take Extensive Visual Records: Use cameras and video recorders to document the scene, the extent of any damage, the positions of equipment, and any pollution. Ensure all photos and videos are time-stamped if possible.⁹⁷
• Secure Electronic Data: Immediately preserve all relevant electronic data. This includes saving the data from the Voyage Data Recorder (VDR), taking printouts from the GPS, course recorder, and engine log, and downloading the ECDIS track history for the period leading up to the incident.⁹⁷
• Obtain Witness Statements: Instruct all crew members who witnessed any part of the incident to write their own detailed, factual statements of what they personally saw and heard. This must be done as soon as possible while memories are fresh. They should stick to facts, not opinions.⁹⁷
• Write a Master’s Report: The Master should compile their own detailed, chronological account of the events leading up to, during, and after the incident, based on their personal knowledge and the ship’s logbooks.⁹⁷

DO NOT:

• Admit Liability: Never, under any circumstances, admit fault or liability, either verbally or in writing, to anyone.⁹⁷
• Speculate or Offer Opinions: In all reports and communications, stick strictly to the facts. Do not speculate on the cause of the incident or express personal opinions.⁹⁷
• Allow Uncontrolled Access: Do not allow any external lawyer, surveyor, or investigator on board without first verifying their identity and confirming with the P&I correspondent that they are appointed to act for the owner’s interests.⁹⁷ If surveyors for opposing interests are granted access, they must be accompanied by the Club’s surveyor at all times.
• Release Evidence: Do not give any documents, data, or physical evidence to any party without the express permission of the P&I Club’s appointed lawyer or surveyor.⁹⁸

The following checklists provide specific guidance for common incidents:

• Collision: Immediately assess the vessel’s stability and damage. Render assistance to the other vessel if safe to do so. Exchange required information (ship’s name, port of registry, last/next port). Preserve all navigational data, including charts, logbooks, and electronic records. Hoist “Not Under Command” signals if necessary and broadcast warnings to other traffic. Issue a Note of Protest upon arrival in port.³³
• Pollution: Immediately activate the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) or Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plan (SMPEP). Take all possible measures to identify and stop the source of the leak. Deploy onboard spill response equipment (booms, absorbents) to mitigate the spill. Notify authorities and the P&I Club. Collect samples of the spilled substance, seal and label them, and record all actions taken in the Oil Record Book or Garbage Record Book.²¹
• Crew Injury: The immediate priority is the safety and medical care of the injured person. Administer first aid, contact a radio medical advice service for guidance, and arrange for evacuation (Medivac) if necessary. Secure the area of the accident and preserve any equipment involved. Complete the company’s accident report form and make a detailed entry in the Official Logbook. Obtain statements from the injured person (if possible) and any witnesses.¹⁰⁶

Table 4: Post-Incident Evidence Collection Checklist

Evidence Type	Specific Items to Secure	Key Action / Note
Physical	Broken/failed equipment (ropes, wires, shackles, hoses, etc.). Cargo samples (pre- and post-damage).	Label with date, time, location. Store securely. Do not allow testing by third parties without Club approval.
Electronic	Voyage Data Recorder (VDR / S-VDR) data. ECDIS track history and alarms. GPS, AIS, and course recorder data. Engine room alarm logs and telegraph recorder.	Save VDR data immediately to prevent overwriting. Download/print all relevant data for the period before, during, and after the incident.
Documentary	Official, Deck, and Engine Logbooks. Bell book / movement book. Navigational charts in use. Passage plan. Weather reports. Ballast/bunker/cargo records. Maintenance records for involved equipment.	Make copies of all relevant logbook pages. Do not alter original entries. Secure the actual charts used.
Witness	Written statements from all crew members with direct knowledge.	Must be in their own words. Factual accounts only (what they saw/heard). No opinions or speculation. Should be written and signed as soon as possible.
Photographic	Photos/videos of damage, accident scene, pollution, equipment condition, weather conditions, etc.	Take wide-angle and close-up shots. Time-stamp if possible. Ensure photos provide context.

Section 3.4: What to Expect When You Call the P&I Correspondent

The P&I correspondent is the Club’s local representative and the Master’s most crucial point of contact on the ground following an incident.¹⁰⁹ They are typically maritime professionals—lawyers, surveyors, or former mariners—with deep knowledge of local laws, regulations, and customs, and strong relationships with local authorities like the port master, customs, and immigration officials.¹⁰⁹

When the Master calls the correspondent, they are activating a rapid-response support system. The correspondent’s principal function is to provide immediate, practical assistance to deal with the multitude of problems that can arise.¹⁰⁹ Their role is to stand in the shoes of the P&I Club, protecting the member’s interests. This involves:

• Appointing Experts: The correspondent will immediately appoint necessary local experts on the Club’s behalf. This can include surveyors to assess damage, lawyers to provide legal advice and represent the owner’s interests, and technical consultants as needed.
• Liaising with Authorities: They will act as the primary liaison with local authorities, helping the Master navigate complex and often intimidating interactions with police, port officials, and environmental agencies.
• Evidence Gathering: They will guide and assist the Master in the process of gathering and preserving evidence, ensuring that the information collected is what will be needed to defend a potential claim.
• Practical Assistance: In major incidents, their role can expand to arranging for the repatriation of passengers, finding accommodation for crew, or coordinating medical care.¹⁰⁹

The Master should treat the correspondent as a trusted member of the vessel’s emergency response team. It is essential to provide them with a full, factual briefing on the incident and to follow their advice and instructions. By handling the complex shore-side logistics and legal maneuvering, the correspondent allows the Master to focus on their primary duties: the safety of the vessel, its crew, and the marine environment.

Part IV: The Integrated Framework – Practical Application for the Master

Section 4.1: The Interplay of Flag, Class, and P&I

A vessel’s compliance and risk profile cannot be managed in silos. The Flag State, Classification Society, and P&I Club form a deeply integrated system where the performance and perception in one domain directly and predictably influence the risks and requirements in the others. For the Master, recognizing these interconnections is key to effective management.

A poor record with one entity creates a cascade of negative consequences across the board. A vessel flagged with a state that is on a PSC blacklist (e.g., the Paris or Tokyo MoU blacklists) will automatically have a higher risk profile.⁵ This guarantees more frequent and more detailed PSC inspections, increasing the operational burden and the likelihood of detention, regardless of the vessel’s actual condition.

Similarly, a poor record with a Classification Society—evidenced by frequent or overdue Conditions of Class, or a history of changing class to less reputable societies—is a major red flag for both Port State Control and P&I underwriters.⁷¹ P&I Club rules are explicit: it is a condition of cover that the vessel must be and remain “in class” with a society

approved by the Club.⁵⁶ A shipowner who changes their vessel to a classification society not approved by their P&I Club risks having their insurance cover cease immediately and without notice.⁷¹ Insurers and charterers view the choice of Class as a proxy for the owner’s commitment to quality and safety.

This relationship is reciprocal. A poor claims record with a P&I Club can lead to higher premiums, but it can also trigger a “Member Risk Review” or a loss prevention survey from the Club.⁸³ These surveys, conducted by the Club’s own technical experts, function very much like a Class or PSC audit, examining the vessel’s condition, the crew’s competence, and the effectiveness of the shipboard management systems to identify the root causes of claims.⁵⁶ Furthermore, weak oversight by a Flag State, particularly in verifying that its vessels hold valid and adequate insurance from a reputable P&I Club, creates systemic risk. It allows potentially uninsured or underinsured vessels to trade, exposing all parties in the supply chain to significant financial and compliance risks should an incident occur.¹¹⁰ The Master sits at the center of this web, where maintaining a clean record with Class is essential for satisfying P&I, and satisfying both is essential for navigating PSC scrutiny.

Section 4.2: Preparing for Port State Control: An Integrated Checklist

Preparation for a Port State Control inspection should not be a last-minute scramble. It should be the natural outcome of a continuously well-managed vessel. A successful PSC inspection is the ultimate validation of the entire Flag-Class-P&I compliance system. The Master can use the following integrated approach to ensure readiness.

The Holistic PSC Readiness Checklist:

• Documentation (The Flag):
  • Are all statutory certificates (SOLAS, MARPOL, LL, etc.) and the Class Certificate on board, original, valid, and properly endorsed after their respective surveys? ¹⁹
  • Are all crew Certificates of Competency (CoC) and GMDSS certificates valid and accompanied by the correct Flag State endorsements? ²²
  • Is the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) certificate and Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance (DMLC) on board? Are the financial security certificates for repatriation and contractual claims posted in a conspicuous place? ⁴²
  • Are all official logbooks, the Oil Record Book, Garbage Record Book, and records of rest hours meticulously and accurately maintained and up-to-date? ³⁴
• Structural & Equipment Condition (The Class):
  • Are there any outstanding Conditions of Class or survey recommendations? If so, is there a clear plan for rectification within the given deadline? ⁷³
  • Is the general condition of the hull, decks, accommodation, and engine room clean and well-maintained? Are signs of corrosion, leaks, or damage promptly addressed? ⁴⁴
  • Are all fire dampers, watertight doors, and weathertight closing appliances (hatch covers, vents) fully operational, well-maintained, and clearly marked? ⁴⁴
  • Are life-saving appliances (lifeboats, rescue boats, life rafts, lifejackets) and fire-fighting equipment (pumps, hoses, extinguishers, fixed systems) in good condition, fully operational, and ready for immediate use? ⁶⁰
• Operational Readiness (The P&I / SMS):
  • Can the crew demonstrate proficiency in their duties during emergency drills (e.g., fire drill, abandon ship drill, enclosed space rescue)? Are drills conducted and recorded as per SOLAS requirements? ³²
  • Is the crew familiar with the procedures in the SOPEP/SMPEP and the location of all pollution response equipment? ²¹
  • Can bridge and engine room watchstanders demonstrate familiarity with the operation of key equipment and alarm systems? ⁴⁵
  • Is the vessel’s passage plan comprehensive and has it been properly executed and monitored, as required by the SMS? ⁹¹

To aid in this preparation, the following table translates common PSC deficiency codes into proactive, preventative actions for the Master.

Table 5: Common PSC Deficiency Codes and Master’s Preventative Actions

PSC Code	Deficiency Description	Relevant Convention	Master’s Preventative Action
07105	Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions	SOLAS	Implement a PMS task for weekly inspection of all fire doors to ensure self-closing devices are operational and they are not illegally held open. Document in logbook.
07115	Fire dampers	SOLAS	Incorporate all fire dampers into the PMS for monthly operational testing and quarterly lubrication. Ensure remote closing mechanisms are functional.
10103	Lifeboats	SOLAS	Conduct weekly visual inspections and monthly launching drills (without crew) as per SOLAS. Ensure engine is started weekly. Check all inventory and equipment.
15104	Oily water separator / filtering equipment	MARPOL Annex I	Ensure the OWS is only operated by trained personnel. Regularly check filter condition and alarm functions. Ensure all operations are correctly recorded in the Oil Record Book Part I.
01308	Records of rest	STCW	Implement and enforce a strict policy for accurate recording of work/rest hours. Use software if available. Regularly audit records to ensure compliance and address fatigue issues.
04102	Emergency fire pump and its pipes	SOLAS	Test run the emergency fire pump weekly. During test, confirm suction and adequate pressure at the furthest hydrants. Inspect pipes for corrosion or leaks.
09215	Seafarers’ Employment Agreement	MLC, 2006	Ensure every seafarer has a signed SEA on board that complies with MLC requirements. Ensure a copy is available to the seafarer and it is in English.
01107	Safety Management Certificate (SMC)	ISM Code	Conduct regular internal audits as per the SMS. Ensure all crew are familiar with their SMS duties and that all required records (drills, maintenance, etc.) are up to date.

Section 4.3: Case Studies: Lessons from the Field

The theoretical interplay of Flag, Class, and P&I is best understood through the lens of real-world incidents, where failures in one part of the system lead to catastrophic consequences.

Case Study 1: Grounding due to Voyage Planning & ECDIS Failure (e.g., CMA CGM Libra, Kaami)

• Incident Analysis: The grounding of the CMA CGM Libra occurred because the voyage plan, prepared by the second officer and approved by the Master, failed to mark known shallow areas outside the main channel. The Master, unaware of the danger, deviated from the planned route, leading to the grounding.⁹¹ The
  Kaami grounding was even more systemic, involving an improper route based on past experience, incorrect ECDIS safety settings (safety contour, UKC), failure to use the route check function, and a general lack of monitoring.⁹¹
• Interconnected Failures: These incidents represent a profound failure in the vessel’s Safety Management System (a Flag/ISM requirement), demonstrating a lack of crew competency and bridge resource management (STCW failures). The resulting grounding led to significant hull damage (a Class issue requiring major repairs) and a massive potential liability claim for salvage, repair, and cargo interests (a P&I event). The cases highlight how modern tools like ECDIS, if not used correctly, can create a false sense of security and lead to disaster.

Case Study 2: Collision due to Master-Pilot Communication Breakdown (e.g., Containership Collision with Gantry Crane)

• Incident Analysis: A containership under pilotage was approaching a berth at what the Master felt was an excessive speed. Due to inadequate communication, the Master was unsure of the pilot’s plan and took the con. However, his subsequent engine orders led to a loss of momentum and control, causing the vessel to collide with a gantry crane.⁹¹
• Interconnected Failures: This incident underscores the Master’s ultimate responsibility for the vessel’s safety, a core principle of Flag State law, even with a pilot on board. The failure to establish a clear, shared mental model between the Master and pilot represents a breakdown in Bridge Resource Management (BRM), a key focus of P&I loss prevention. The resulting collision caused property damage to both the ship (a Class/H&M issue) and the terminal (a P&I liability).

Case Study 3: Sinking due to Cargo Liquefaction (Bulk Jupiter)

• Incident Analysis: The bulk carrier Bulk Jupiter sank rapidly after its cargo of bauxite, which had been exposed to heavy rain, liquefied in heavy seas. The cargo’s moisture content was far above the Transportable Moisture Limit (TML), yet it was loaded without independent testing by the Master. The violent rolling of the ship caused the cargo to shift and lose its stability, leading to capsizing and the loss of 18 crew lives.⁹¹
• Interconnected Failures: This tragedy illustrates a failure to comply with the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code, a mandatory instrument under SOLAS (a Flag State requirement). The Master had the authority and responsibility to refuse a cargo that appeared unsafe. The resulting loss of the vessel was a total loss for Class and H&M insurers, and the catastrophic loss of life created immense P&I liabilities.

Case Study 4: Anchor Dragging and Multiple Collisions (Britannia P&I Case Study)

• Incident Analysis: A general cargo ship had lost its port anchor and was operating under a Condition of Class (CoC) that required its main engine to be on standby while at anchor. In deteriorating weather, the Master ordered the engine to be stopped, directly violating the CoC. The anchor began to drag, but due to poor watchkeeping, this was not detected in time. The ship collided with one vessel, and the entangled ships then drifted into a third.⁷⁵
• Interconnected Failures: This case is a textbook example of the domino effect. The initial failure was a direct violation of a formal mandate from the Classification Society (the CoC). This was compounded by poor seamanship and a failure of watchkeeping (an STCW and SMS failure). The resulting collisions created a complex web of P&I liabilities for damage to three vessels and potential business interruption claims. The incident demonstrates how ignoring a Class requirement can directly lead to a major P&I claim.

Appendices

Appendix A: Master Checklist of Onboard Statutory & Class Certificates

This checklist provides a comprehensive, though not exhaustive, list of the primary certificates and documents a Master must ensure are on board, valid, and available for inspection. The specific list may vary slightly based on ship type, age, and Flag State.

Ship Certificates:

• Certificate of Registry (Flag State, Permanent until change) ¹⁸
• International Tonnage Certificate (1969) (Flag/RO, Permanent) ¹⁸
• Classification Certificate (Class Society, 5 years) ¹⁴
• Passenger Ship Safety Certificate (Flag/RO, 1 year) OR ¹⁸
• Cargo Ship Safety Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years) OR the following three: ¹⁸
  • Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years)
  • Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years)
  • Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years)
• International Load Line Certificate (1966) (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• International Air Pollution Prevention (IAPP) Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• International Energy Efficiency Certificate (IEE) (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁹
• Document of Compliance (DOC) – copy for ship (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• Safety Management Certificate (SMC) (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• Maritime Labour Certificate (MLC) (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance (DMLC) Parts I & II (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁹
• Certificate of Insurance or other Financial Security for Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC) (Flag State, 1 year) ¹⁹
• Certificate of Insurance or other Financial Security for Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (Flag State, 1 year) ²²
• Certificates of Financial Security for Repatriation and Shipowner’s Liability (MLC Amendments) (P&I Club/Insurer, 1 year) ¹⁹
• International Anti-fouling System Certificate (Flag/RO, 5 years) ¹⁸
• Minimum Safe Manning Document (Flag State, Permanent until change) ¹⁸
• Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) (Flag State, Continuous record) ¹⁹
• Ship Sanitation Control / Exemption Certificate (Port Health Authority, 6 months) ²³

Ship-Type Specific Certificates:

• International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (IBC Code) ¹⁸
• International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code) ¹⁸
• Document of compliance for the carriage of dangerous goods ¹⁸
• Document of authorization for the carriage of grain ¹⁸

Key Onboard Documents & Records:

• Official, Deck, and Engine Logbooks
• Oil Record Book (Parts I & II)
• Garbage Record Book
• Ballast Water Record Book
• SOPEP / SMPEP
• Ship Security Plan (SSP)
• Passage Plans
• Records of Rest Hours
• Maintenance Records (PMS)
• Survey Status Report / Survey Report File ¹⁹

Appendix B: Emergency Contact and Notification Protocol Template

(To be completed by Master and posted in a conspicuous location on the Bridge and in the Ship’s Office)

IN CASE OF ANY SERIOUS INCIDENT (COLLISION, GROUNDING, FIRE, POLLUTION, SERIOUS INJURY, DETENTION), NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING PARTIES IMMEDIATELY IN THIS ORDER:

1. COMPANY (OWNER/MANAGER)

• Designated Person Ashore (DPA):
  • Name: _______________________________
  • 24/7 Phone: _________________________
  • Email: _______________________________
• Technical Superintendent:
  • Name: _______________________________
  • 24/7 Phone: _________________________
  • Email: _______________________________

2. P&I CLUB CORRESPONDENT (NEAREST PORT)

• P&I Club: ____________________________
• Local Correspondent Firm: _________________
• Location (Port/Country): __________________
• 24/7 Phone: _________________________
• Email: _______________________________
• (Alternative) P&I Club 24/7 Emergency Number: _________________ ⁹⁹

3. RELEVANT AUTHORITIES

• Search and Rescue (Distress/Urgency):
  • VHF Channel 16: “MAYDAY” or “PAN PAN” ¹⁰⁰
  • Local MRCC / Coast Guard Phone: ______________ ¹⁰⁰
• Pollution Reporting:
  • National Response Center / Coastal State Authority Phone: _____________ ¹⁰¹
• Port State Control / Harbour Master:
  • Local Port Authority VHF Channel: ____________
  • Port Authority Office Phone: _________________

4. FLAG STATE ADMINISTRATION

• 24/7 Duty Officer Phone: ___________________
• Email: _______________________________
• Reporting Requirements Link: _______________

5. CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY

• Local Office Phone: ______________________
• 24/7 Emergency/Damage Assessment Phone: ____________________
• Email: _______________________________

Appendix C: Glossary of Key Maritime Terms and Acronyms

• ABS: American Bureau of Shipping, a classification society.¹¹³
• BTM: Bridge Team Management.
• BRM: Bridge Resource Management.
• Class: Classification Society.
• CoC: Condition of Class. A mandate from a Class society to rectify a defect affecting class within a specified time.⁷²
• CoC: Certificate of Competency. A certificate issued to a seafarer under STCW.²²
• DNV: Det Norske Veritas, a classification society.⁶¹
• DOC: Document of Compliance. A certificate issued to a company under the ISM Code.¹⁸
• DPA: Designated Person Ashore. A key role under the ISM Code.
• ECDIS: Electronic Chart Display and Information System.
• ESP: Enhanced Survey Programme. A required planning document for Special Surveys on certain ship types.⁶⁸
• FOC: Flag of Convenience. An open registry that allows foreign shipowners to register their vessels.¹
• IACS: International Association of Classification Societies. A quality-assurance body for leading classification societies.¹⁴
• IG: International Group of P&I Clubs. A consortium of the 13 leading P&I clubs that provides claims pooling and reinsurance.⁷⁸
• IMO: International Maritime Organization. A specialized agency of the UN responsible for maritime safety, security, and pollution prevention.¹
• ISM Code: International Safety Management Code. A mandatory international standard for the safe management and operation of ships.²⁰
• ISPS Code: International Ship and Port Facility Security Code. A mandatory international standard for maritime security.²⁰
• ITF: International Transport Workers’ Federation. A global union federation for transport workers, including seafarers.²⁸
• LL: International Convention on Load Lines.¹⁰
• LR: Lloyd’s Register, a classification society.¹¹⁴
• MARPOL: International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships.¹¹
• MLC: Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. An international convention setting out seafarers’ rights to decent conditions of work.²⁰
• MoU: Memorandum of Understanding. A regional agreement between states to coordinate Port State Control inspections.⁹
• P&I: Protection and Indemnity. Mutual, third-party liability insurance for shipowners.⁴⁰
• PSC: Port State Control. The inspection of foreign ships in national ports.³⁵
• PSCO: Port State Control Officer.
• RO: Recognized Organization. An organization, typically a Class society, authorized by a Flag State to perform statutory surveys and certification on its behalf.¹³
• SMC: Safety Management Certificate. A certificate issued to a ship under the ISM Code.¹⁸
• SOLAS: International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. The most important international treaty concerning the safety of merchant ships.¹⁰
• SOPEP: Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan. A mandatory plan for responding to oil spills.²¹
• STCW: International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers.¹⁰
• UNCLOS: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. An international treaty that provides a regulatory framework for the use of the world’s seas and oceans.²
• VDR: Voyage Data Recorder. A “black box” for ships.

Works cited

1. Flag State vs. Port State – Maritime Institute of Technology and …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.mitags.org/flag-vs-port-state/
2. Flag state – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_state
3. What are Flag States in the Shipping Industry And What’s Their Role? – Marine Insight, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/what-are-flag-states-in-the-shipping-industry-2/
4. Duties of Flag States to Implement and Enforce International Standards and Regulations – Scholarship @ Hofstra Law, accessed June 16, 2025, https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1171&context=jibl
5. Flags of convenience – NGO Shipbreaking Platform, accessed June 16, 2025, https://shipbreakingplatform.org/issues-of-interest/focs/
6. The Role of the Flag State, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.dohle-yachts.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/The-Role-of-the-Flag-State.pdf
7. 2.2 Flag State jurisdiction and responsibilities – MarIus, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.sjorettsfondet.no/journal/2023/570/m-454
8. guidelines to assist flag states in the – implementation of imo instruments – DIRECTEMAR |, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.directemar.cl/directemar/site/docs/20170301/20170301145538/847_20.pdf
9. Implementation, Control and Coordination – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/msas/pages/implementationofimoinstruments.aspx
10. Implementation of Instruments Support – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/IIIS/Pages/Default.aspx
11. The role of Flag States – EMISA, accessed June 16, 2025, https://emisa.eu/the-role-of-flag-states/
12. Part 2 – Flag States, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imorules.com/GUID-A31539E3-1EBD-464E-82B6-8D3CA5096EAD.html
13. Significance of Classification Society in the Maritime industry – Irclass.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.irclass.org/media/6694/maritime-matrix-today-may-2023-significance-of-classification-society-in-the-maritime-industry-1.pdf
14. Classification societies — Home – Deutsche Flagge, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.deutsche-flagge.de/en/german-flag/about-us/classification-societies-2
15. Classification Survey vs Flag State Survey: What’s the Difference? – Sea of Competency, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.seaoc.co.uk/articles/class-amp-flag-survey-do-you-know-the-difference
16. RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/IIIS/Pages/Recognized-Organizations.aspx
17. code for recognized organizations (ro code), accessed June 16, 2025, https://images.io.gov.mo/bo/ii/2016/14/avce-20-2016-an-en.pdf
18. List of Statutory Certificate | PDF | Shipping | Water Transport – Scribd, accessed June 16, 2025, https://fr.scribd.com/document/288708732/List-of-Statutory-certificate-doc
19. LIST OF CERTIFICATES TO BE VERIFIED – Mediterranean MoU, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.medmou.org/Documents/1.4%20List%20of%20Certificates%20to%20be%20verified.pdf
20. Flag State Implementation Course – Imssea, accessed June 16, 2025, https://imssea.org/flag-state-implementation/
21. Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) – Maritime Education, accessed June 16, 2025, https://maritimeducation.com/shipboard-oil-pollution-emergency-plan-sopep/
22. ANNEX I PORT STATE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Note – ClassNK, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/pdf/activities/statutory/ism/flag/hongkong/ism_hongkong_MSIN-54-2015-annex1.pdf
23. Statutory Certificates to be carried by a ship – DieselShip, accessed June 16, 2025, https://dieselship.com/management/statutory-certificates/
24. en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_registration#:~:text=A%20register%20that%20is%20open,sometimes%20called%20flags%20of%20convenience.
25. What is a Flag of Convenience and is it Needed? – Law Offices of Charles D. Naylor, accessed June 16, 2025, https://naylorlaw.com/blog/flag-of-convenience/
26. Ship registration – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_registration
27. Flags of Convenience – Definition, Benefits & Challenges – Virtue Marine, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/flags-of-convenience-definition-benefits-challenges
28. What is a Flag of Convenience – Windward, accessed June 16, 2025, https://windward.ai/glossary/flag-of-convenience/
29. Flags of Convenience | ITF Global, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.itfglobal.org/en/sector/seafarers/flags-convenience
30. INSPECTION REGIME ON PARIS MOU – safety4sea, accessed June 16, 2025, https://safety4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/BIMCO-The-Inspection-Regime-on-Paris-MoU-2018_10.pdf
31. List of Tokyo MOU Deficiency Codes1 As of 23 December 2024, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.tokyo-mou.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Tokyo-MOU-deficiency-codes-December-2024.pdf
32. Types of Inspection | Paris MoU, accessed June 16, 2025, https://parismou.org/PMoU-Procedures/Library/types-inspection
33. www.oocities.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.oocities.org/mpaoral/ch1/ActionInColn.htm#:~:text=Report%20the%20accident%20to%20Marine,spark%2C%20fire%2C%20sinking%20etc.
34. GUIDE: Get ready for port state control – SERTICA, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.sertica.com/insights/papers/get-ready-for-port-state-control/
35. Port State Control – International Maritime Organization, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/IIIS/Pages/Port%20State%20Control.aspx
36. Marine Safety: Port State Control – Department of Defense, accessed June 16, 2025, https://media.defense.gov/2022/Feb/09/2002935707/-1/-1/0/CI_16000_73.PDF
37. Memorandum | Paris MoU, accessed June 16, 2025, https://parismou.org/PMoU-Procedures/Library/memorandum
38. Selection scheme | Paris MoU, accessed June 16, 2025, https://parismou.org/PMoU-Procedures/Library/selection-scheme
39. Flag and Port State Info – American Bureau of Shipping, accessed June 16, 2025, https://ww2.eagle.org/en/rules-and-resources/flag-port-state-information.html
40. What is P&I? | Protection and Indemnity – Standard Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.standard-club.com/about/what-is-pi/
41. How to prepare for a PSC (Port State Control) Inspection – Virtue Marine, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/how-to-prepare-for-a-psc-port-state-control-inspection
42. Changes to MLC Financial Security – News – International Yacht Solutions – Ownership & Administration, accessed June 16, 2025, https://yachtownership-solutions.com/en/news/changes-to-mlc-financial-security
43. Port State Control – CIC 2024 on crew wages and seafarer employment agreements under MLC – DNV, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.dnv.com/news/port-state-control-cic-2024-on-crew-wages-and-seafarer-employment-agreements-under-mlc/
44. Guidance on type of inspections – Paris MoU, accessed June 16, 2025, https://parismou.org/sites/default/files/Guidance%20on%20type%20of%20inspection.pdf
45. Tokyo MOU Deficiency Codes | PDF | Ships | Oil Tanker – Scribd, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/doc/255255084/Tokyo-MOU-Deficiency-Codes
46. Detention of ships – Deutsche Flagge, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.deutsche-flagge.de/en/pscen/enforcement-and-detention
47. Implications of PSC Code 17: From Deficiency to Detention – Virtue Marine, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/implications-of-psc-code-17-from-deficiency-to-detention
48. Full article: An in-depth analysis of port state control inspections: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25725084.2025.2454754
49. Detained at port: the costly consequences of safety failures – Star International, accessed June 16, 2025, https://star-international.co.uk/insights/detained-at-port-the-costly-consequences-of-safety-failures/
50. Detained at port: the costly consequences of safety failures – Star …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.star-international.co.uk/insights/detained-at-port-the-costly-consequences-of-safety-failures/
51. www.emsa.europa.eu, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.emsa.europa.eu/inspections/90-classification-societies.html#:~:text=Classification%20societies%20are%20organisations%20which,and%20inspections%20on%20board%20ships.
52. Ship classification society – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_classification_society
53. CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPPING WHAT IS A MARINE SOCIETY OR REGISTER ?, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.oceansplasticleanup.com/Conservationists_Charities_Marine_Societies/Classification_Of_Ships_Shipping_Bureau_Registers_Societies/Classification_Societies_What_Is_A_Society_Marine.htm
54. Class Inspection | Captainslog, accessed June 16, 2025, https://captainslog.gr/class-inspection/
55. Classification – International Register of Shipping (INTLREG), accessed June 16, 2025, https://intlreg.org/classification/
56. The role of the marine surveyor – a P&I club’s perspective, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.iims.org.uk/the-role-of-the-marine-surveyor-a-pi-clubs-perspective/
57. Statutory Survey – INTERNATIONAL SHIP CLASSIFICATION, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.isclass.com/Services/StatutorySurvey
58. Classification Societies – EMSA – European Maritime Safety Agency, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.emsa.europa.eu/inspections/90-classification-societies.html
59. Condition of Class | PDF | Ships – Scribd, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/623239376/Condition-of-Class
60. Top reasons for Port State Control detentions | Oceans HQ, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.oceanshq.com/articles/top-reasons-for-port-state-control-detentions/
61. Class Surveys: Understanding Vessel Inspections – Claimar, accessed June 16, 2025, https://claimar.com/class-surveys-understanding-vessel-inspections/
62. Do you know the various types of survey onboard? – SAFETY4SEA, accessed June 16, 2025, https://safety4sea.com/do-you-know-the-various-types-of-survey-onboard/
63. Vessel safety survey – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vessel_safety_survey
64. IACS: Annual and Intermediate Survey requirements per IMO A.1186(33), accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.marineregulations.news/iacs-annual-and-intermediate-survey-requirements-per-imo-a-1186-33/
65. Section 3 Intermediate Surveys – Hull and machinery requirements, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.imorules.com/LRSHIP_PT1_CH3_3.html
66. Classification and Statutory Surveys for Mega Yachts | LR – Lloyd’s Register, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.lr.org/en/services/advisory/operational-services/maritime-training/understanding-rules-and-regulations/classification-and-statutory-surveys-for-mega-yachts/
67. 17/2022 – Special Survey – New requirements for Chemical and Double Hull Oil Tankers, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.lr.org/en/knowledge/class-news/17-22/
68. Enhanced survey programme | LR – Lloyd’s Register, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.lr.org/en/services/classification-certification/enhanced-survey-programme/
69. An Introduction to Vessel Classes – 4C Offshore, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.4coffshore.com/support/an-introduction-to-vessel-classes-aid1.html
70. Navigating Class Rules with Ease – Number Analytics, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-class-rules-navigation-seamanship-scientists
71. Section 1 Member’s obligations with regard to classification and …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.swedishclub.com/rules-and-exceptions/part-two-comments/chapter-iii-conditions-for-cover/rule-10-conditions/section-1-members-obligations-with-regard-to-classification-and-requirements-by-classification-society-flag-state-or-otherwise/
72. www.virtuemarine.nl, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/what-is-a-condition-of-class#:~:text=A%20Condition%20of%20Class%20is,maintaining%20the%20ship’s%20classification%20status.
73. What is a ‘Condition of Class’? – Virtue Marine, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/what-is-a-condition-of-class
74. What is condition of class ? – MySeaTime, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.myseatime.com/discussion/condition-of-class
75. INCIDENT CASE STUDY – Britannia P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://britanniapandi.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/BSafe-Case-Study-22-Dragging-Anchor-Leading-to-Multiple-Collisions.pdf
76. What is P&I Insurance? – The Shipowners’ Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.shipownersclub.com/who-we-are/what-is-p-and-i-insurance/
77. Protection and indemnity insurance – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_and_indemnity_insurance
78. About the International Group of P&I Clubs – The International Group …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.igpandi.org/article/about/
79. What is a P&I Club? – Virtue Marine, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.virtuemarine.nl/post/what-is-a-p-n-i-club
80. Why Use P&I Clubs | Quay Marine Insurance, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.quaymarineinsurance.com.au/why-use-pandi-clubs
81. Loss Prevention – Targeted and Tailored Loss Prevention Support – North P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.nepia.com/about-us/what-we-do/loss-prevention/
82. Loss Prevention – The Shipowners’ Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.shipownersclub.com/our-services/loss-prevention/
83. Loss Prevention – Standard Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.standard-club.com/loss-prevention/
84. Master’s Guides | Loss Prevention – Standard Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.standard-club.com/loss-prevention/masters-guides/
85. Gard Handbook on Protection of the Marine Environment | Gard’s Rules, Statutes and Guidances, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gard.no/rules-statutes-and-guidances/document/gard-handbook-on-protection-of-the-marine-environment/
86. Rules, Statutes and Guidances – Gard, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gard.no/rules-statutes-and-guidances/
87. Loss Prevention – The Swedish Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.swedishclub.com/media/loss-prevention/
88. Loss Prevention case studies – Gard, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gard.no/document/loss-prevention-case-studies-overview/
89. Anchor loss | Gard, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gard.no/document/anchor-loss/
90. P&I Loss Prevention Bulletin, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.piclub.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Loss-Prevention-Bulletin-Vol.39-Full.pdf
91. LOOKOUT – UK P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ukpandi.com/fileadmin/uploads/ukpandi/Documents/uk-p-i-club/publications/2024/UKPI_Japan_Branch_Lookout_SP_2024.pdf
92. Case Study: A falling incident from a ladder – UK P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/news/article/articles/2022/case-study-a-falling-incident-from-a-ladder/
93. News and Insights | Gard, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gard.no/articles/
94. Manage Risks | Maritime Risk Management – UK P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ukpandi.com/manage-risks/
95. Rules – UK P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/rules/
96. Principles of Risk Assessment and Risk Management – North P&I Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.nepia.com/risk-management-lp-briefing/1000
97. A Master’s Guide to Shipboard Accident Response – Standard Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.standard-club.com/fileadmin/uploads/standardclub/Documents/Import/publications/masters-guides/24173-CTCMG2SAR_disclaimer.pdf
98. Shipboard Accident Response – Maritime Safety Innovation Lab LLC, accessed June 16, 2025, https://maritimesafetyinnovationlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/mg-accident-response.pdf
99. P&I Guidelines, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.westpandi.com/getattachment/efeb1091-8a52-41d6-9a8a-2de7f09ce43a/woe10714_p-i_guidelines_uk_rgb_spreads.pdf
100. Contact USCG SAR – dco.uscg.mil – Coast Guard, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Assistant-Commandant-for-Response-Policy-CG-5R/Office-of-Incident-Management-Preparedness-CG-5RI/US-Coast-Guard-Office-of-Search-and-Rescue-CG-SAR/Contact-USCG-SAR/
101. Emergency Contacts | Port of South Louisiana, accessed June 16, 2025, https://portsl.com/emergency-contacts/
102. How P & I Clubs Work – Procedure for Accident Response – Marine Insight, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/how-p-i-clubs-work-procedure-for-accident-response/
103. What Are the 8 Important Things to Do During a Ship Collision Accident?, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.prestoneasley.com/blog/what-are-the-8-important-things-to-do-during-a-ship-collision-accident/
104. Actions as a master in case of collision – OoCities.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.oocities.org/mpaoral/ch1/ActionInColn.htm
105. Ship oil pollution emergency plan – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_oil_pollution_emergency_plan
106. Section 1 Injury, illness, repatriation and death – crew – The Swedish Club, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.swedishclub.com/rules-and-exceptions/part-two-comments/chapter-2-risks-covered/rule-3-liabilities-in-respect-of-persons-2/section-1-injury-illness-repatriation-and-death-crew/
107. Crew Member Injuries on Commercial Vessels: What Are Their Legal Options? – Pay Only If We Win, accessed June 16, 2025, https://albtriallawyers.com/crew-member-injuries-on-commercial-vessels-what-are-their-legal-options/
108. Emergency Procedures: Personnel injuries and illness when …, accessed June 16, 2025, https://safety4sea.com/cm-emergency-procedures-personnel-injuries-or-illness-when-onboard/
109. The role of the P&I correspondent – Itic-insure.com, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.itic-insure.com/our-publications/intermediary/the-role-of-the-p-i-correspondent-2859/
110. When Flag States Miss the Mark: Risks, Gaps, and the Sanctions Fallout – Windward, accessed June 16, 2025, https://windward.ai/blog/when-flag-states-miss-the-mark-risks-gaps-and-the-sanctions-fallout/
111. FAQs: Maritime Labour Convention 2006 As Amended Financial Security Requirements, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.shipownersclub.com/latest-updates/publications/faqs-maritime-labour-convention-2006-amended-financial-security-requirements/
112. Amendments to MLC 2006 – New compulsory financial security requirements relating to repatriation of abandoned seafarers and work injury compensation. – Irclass.org, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.irclass.org/technical-circulars/amendments-to-mlc-2006-new-compulsory-financial-security-requirements-relating-to-repatriation-of-abandoned-seafarers-and-work-injury-compensation/
113. ABS: new offshore rules 2025 – The International Institute of Marine Surveying (IIMS), accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.iims.org.uk/abs-new-offshore-rules-2025/
114. What is maritime classification? | LR – Lloyd’s Register, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.lr.org/en/about-us/who-we-are/lr-classification/